RE: LeoThread 2025-03-22 13:01
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
It is exasperating to deal with naivety—many shy away from competition, yet challenging the overhyped ventures is absolutely necessary. While living in a world where merit always triumphs is appealing, the market isn’t a meritocracy.
0
0
0.000
It functions more like an arena where liquidity is the ultimate weapon. In this environment, the power to attract and retain volume holds sway.
Success isn’t determined solely by having a sound project; the market tends to reward momentum over the most innovative ideas.
Network effects, widespread adoption, and strategic moves often prevail over raw potential, fueling a winner-takes-all scenario where the dominant secure the bulk of liquidity while smaller projects struggle.
Allowing the market to run its course doesn’t equate to an even distribution—resources are scarce. Projects aiming to stay on top must fiercely compete for liquidity or risk being overtaken by stronger contenders.
This isn’t about embracing sentimentality; it’s simply survival of the fittest. Dismiss any baseless criticism.
"Should a project genuinely stand out, it wouldn’t resort to unfounded attacks just to adjust its own valuation.
Strive for a higher standard."