Using AI to humanize AI
I Saw an Ad where someone was promoting an AI that can help people humanize contents that were created by AI.
So the initial AI is used to write research papers for university students, but the problem was that the professor who was going to grade this research paper would also use another AI checker (which is also an AI) to see if the research paper was done by an AI, and if it came out 100%, the professor went ahead and failed the owner of the research paper.
So the goal of the "humanize AI" campaign was to ensure that people could pass off AI work as their own without being caught.
So I am not opposed to a student using AI to write their research; the issue is that research work is intended to be a form of rite of passage, sometimes a test of whether a student is qualified to go out there, in the job or professional sector, and be the best at what they do.
It would not be a bad idea to use AI to seek knowledge that humans lack, perhaps in the treatment of incurable medical conditions.
For example, if AIs can assist medical doctors in becoming practicing doctors by writing their research papers, why can not these AIs completely replace them and begin performing surgical procedures?
My point is that a profession like medicine should use AI to enhance knowledge, not as the foundation of knowledge. Imagine telling a doctor about your symptoms and they pull up DEEPSEEK to get an answer. Would you be willing to have such people perform surgical procedures on you?
Remember that you're in the place because you're trusting their years of experience and expertise, and it just turned out that the relied on AIs to do their home works and projects.
However, if these AIs are only enhancing their knowledge and teaching them beyond what they already know, that is the necessary advancement in medicine.
But then, can we ever have AIs go beyond the scope of human knowledge?
I do not think so.
AIs can only reproduce or duplicate existing knowledge. There is no newness, only recycling and reconstruction.
For example, why can not an AI create new combinations of medications to treat rare conditions? These can only be achieved through years of human research and testing various prototypes on different people. Having various subjects to study, and so on.
So, most of the time, the concept of AI is to recycle existing knowledge; however, this has serious consequences. Without human effort, AIs' knowledge and reach will be limited, and if AIs begin to take jobs, will not their reach be limited in, say, 250 years from now, due to their inability to tap into the knowledge-experience created by real humans?
Take a look at the GHBLI AI used by almost everyone it just shows that without a preexisting prototype, then AI is as dumb, and if we stop creating, then what knowledge can they feed back to us?
Take a moment to rationalize this concept; once you do, you will realize we are going in circles. For me, I think AI is going to be one of humans biggest achievement, but somehow we're using it in ways which we're not supposed to, and this is why everyone will never 100% for AI.
It's a controversial topic.
For years, we have talked about AI putting people out of work or rendering certain industries obsolete; I suppose that is why some people are opposed to it.
Now, a job owner will be pleased that they will have to pay less, but a person whose job will be eliminated will be saddened, so because there is no general agreement in areas like this, we cannot say "AI is the future" without caution.
A typical example of "take it with a grain of salt" is Hive. If we believe AIs are natural, they should have been part of this ecosystem. But why are we frowning at it here? The concept is that it is lazy, unreal, and unnatural, and many people do not want to replace it with the authentic human experience we have here.
Passing off AI tasks as my work is not something I will do. Unless for the purpose of enhancing rather than entirely replacing. If people are proud of AI, why try to humanize it? As I previously stated, this is a controversial issue.
Interested in some more of my posts
Why Is the grind getting harder?
Monopoly Is the Death of Civilization
Survival: Choas and Scarcity
Crypto: Gut & meaningful Connections
What is the primary barrier to entry in Web3?
What Are Some Things You Should not Do During A Bull Market Year?
Hmmmm, I know that this AI of a thing will start eating deep into the lives of students, encouraging laziness in their academics.
I remember going to many places to conduct my research work, collect data and analyze it... and then proudly defended my project without fidgeting on the stage. I doubt if many students of this AI era would be able to originally do their research this days without relying on AI, 100%. Imagine Using AI to humanize AI, nawaoo
How did we get here biko...
Yeah, I remember back then. Project writing in Nigeria took a lot of effort and time for many students. Imagine a medical doctor student using AI to write their research paper. I wonder how they will get enough experience to actually become experienced practitioners. Some fields shouldn't even consider the use of AI at all.
AI won't be making much of anything new. I agree with that, and I think AI shines the most when helping you refine your ideas or content. It makes me wonder if the best people will be those who can combine their ideas with AI to refine it further.
Indeed. There's hardly anything new with AI except to reshuffle existing knowledge, so if there's no ground breaking knowledge that's not known to man, then what makes it unique?
I agree that application can be a great tool, and that's why it should be a form of help, not the origin of knowledge
@tipu curate
Upvoted 👌 (Mana: 26/56) Liquid rewards.
Thanks a mil
AI may have it's advantages in researching info, and might even be able to help write up a paper for a publication. But in surgery,no... In most surgical cases things go well, but there is always a small percentage where things go exactly the opposite. AI won't be able to handle complications in surgery because they are almost always unique in their own way. Only a human can recognize things before they happen and be prepared to deal with it.
Menial tasks once done by humans will soon be done by machines, and they should be. People should be used for something more than just paperwork. Will that mean less jobs in the future? No, because there will be areas that AI just can't do the job. It will mean more training, but as we have discussed before, adapt or die. The human way... like it or not...
Thanks for the summary. I agree that AI can have its advantages in research info. I'm mostly against it being used completely; in totality. In the most complicated or grey areas of life where the answer cannot be black or white, then AI cannot be considered.
I do agree that the capacity of a human is far beyond sitting and doing paperwork and AI can actually replace people and do this. In innovation, AI will still be man's greatest accomplishment, but it cannot simply go beyond existing knowledge.
Truly, we have to adapt to what's coming. In reality, I think AI can already do a lot and no one can doubt this. Just like we've said, in delicate areas like medicine, it's probably a complete no.
Lool adapt or die indeed.
I have seen countless of those ads online, too. I watched a YouTube where the guy actually highlighted different AI tools where you could generate research papers and still pass it off through another AI tool to make it originally yours..oh! That was so hilarious to me because I was just like, "WTF!" This is more like encouraging people to fully depend on a tool to do the work for you. But that shouldn't be because it's trying to make people forget their brains and creativity while relying on something else.
AI's aim is just to refine your own work and not be the foundation of it. How do you learn, then?
I would also agree that AI shouldn't be allowed in some fields especially the medical field.
Yeah. Nowadays there are countless apps that wants to remake AI content to seem like human. I mean, if we're proud of it, why are we attempting to hide or humanize AI contents?
People no longer rely on it for the purpose of assistance, they just want to completely use it without bothering to even use their intuition.
I have no doubt some medical students in Nigeria might even be using it to write their research work, this is one of the reasons why there are doctors that might be incompetent in Nigeria.
Exactly. That's what people are after now.
yes it might be possible to pull of after a lot of refining the process of re writing although it would never had the same feeling and expression as any other human who writes passionately, thats why someone who has a lot of imagination can just generate content so fast and keep typing without stop, passion, something Ai doesnt have and would be very very hard to duplicate, controversial topic though and I wonder if I will still be alive when an Ai can replicate human emotions because thats what it comes down to when using Ai to simulate human writing ✌️
This will be almost impossible because there are varieties of human emotions. Although when it comes to futuristic tech, anything can be possible, so yes, maybe it might be impossible 50 to 100 years from now.
For me, AI would have gotten to its advanced level when it can create simulation which will be used in perhaps finding cures for incurable medical conditions
Just the heading of this post alone got me laughing..it’s not funny for that’s what we have to deal with….
What about using AI to catch AI…when we use AI to check for AI posts?
The drama continues and only evolves
Well, that can also go for a title as well. But I guess "humanize" does the magic
Yep
Interesting topic, thanks for your insights. The future will be beyond our imagination with the rise of AGI.