......On Real-life AI integration
I have noticed a pattern in most AI robotic movies and TV shows: a few people create robots and abuse them, and then the robots rise and begin to fight humans for the obvious abuse they have suffered, and... oh, the consciousness or human feelings they develop are the result of a rogue scientist who wrote a back code that was activated by the smartest of all the robots, and now they are on their way to destroy humanity.
So, before the film ends, one detective discovers the robots' rogue behavior and attempts to warn the people who built them, but no one listens to him.
Does some TV AI-themed shows exaggerate?
Maybe not, but overreaching? Yes.
This script is nearly identical to almost every robot AI movie I have seen.
One pattern is clear: it's like we're all agreeing that we're abusive of every new shiny tech.
Most of these AI creators want to create an AI that mirrors your real image and transforms it into a cartoon version, or just any version of GROK that can answer the typical day-to-day questions of regular people, or just something repetitive that is already out there.
It is clear that people want to use AI for everything, and if they can build personnel robots for use by simply typing in a prompt, the streets will be filled with robots performing various types of human labor, including dehumanizing labors.
However, robots cannot be brought to life by simply writing prompts. Robotics technology is not cheap, and even if it were, it would likely not be as intelligent as we would like.
A world filled with robots engaged in human labor will undoubtedly be impossible, though we cannot say the same in 100 or 200 years, and even then, I believe it will only be available in specific locations and will be prohibitively expensive to access. I believe AIs are widely overused these days, owing to their low cost (almost free) and ease of use.
Some people see it as a minion or a toy at their disposal, a source of amusement to satisfy their curiosity, and people like this are mostly addicted to using them for that purpose.
Even the ones that you have to pay for and use are still abused, and if these tools become more capable than they were, we will have abused them all to their full potential.
This is not to say that AIs are bad; rather, it is to emphasize that we all agree that we are guilty of misusing shiny technologies and even come up with extended movies with the hope that one day the technologies we are known to abuse will suddenly grow consciousness and begin to fight against these abuses.
Now, I will not say it is reached that point yet because there is only so much CHATBOTS can do. The real abuse would have occurred if we had physical AIs programmed to perform real-time tasks.
As I previously stated, this will be possible in the future, but access will be limited to first-world countries, and perhaps even "generation Z" countries, which will be defined or grouped into countries with full AI integrations. Perhaps I'm starting to bend this post a little into the movies, and it's time to snap out of it.
The types of AI interactions that we can easily do for free are the chatGPTs of the world, as well as GROK and others, and you would be surprised at the types of prompts people are inputting into AIs and bringing to life, all due to sheer creativity.
Just as I've said earlier, it can be fun, and it feels good to just run prompts and voila! what you what is read, and all you do is either download, copy and paste, or just left to marvel at how much it offers.
However, can we exclude potential abuse in favor of creativity? Perhaps not. However, we have a tendency to think of AI as an existing meta that will come and go; this is not the case. It's much of a tool with great utility to actually die off with time.
It is useful for real life and real work in many vast areas of life, and certainly it would not be just about "good" alone, as we have often argued that the uses can create an aura of fakeness.
Should we care if like becomes faker as we go? Possibly not.
Many people are already accustomed to treating their laptops and phones as friends and companions. People use AIs to set reminders, help or recommend the best movies or TV shows, and assist them in a variety of simple but intriguing tasks.
I believe that once people can own their own robots, life will become increasingly isolating. This is when you might realize that more people will find solace in their loneliness, and in their quest to find more interactions this is how the abuse will happen.
A lot of futuristic possibilities exist with AI, especially if we can physically integrate them into robots and give them a programmable identity with some form of consciousness. As previously stated, this will be futuristic and expensive, but for the time being, we are stuck with chatbots and will continue to find new ways to abuse them.
Interested in some more of my posts
Why Is the grind getting harder?
Monopoly Is the Death of Civilization
Survival: Choas and Scarcity
Crypto: Gut & meaningful Connections
What is the primary barrier to entry in Web3?
What Are Some Things You Should not Do During A Bull Market Year?
People could become more isolated if they have robot "friends" surrounding them at all times. There are people who have AI girlfriends already, they would love a robot version I would guess...
Robots will start filling more day to day human tasks, but not extensively for another hundred years or so I would guess. Battlefield robots will likely come first, they're more expendable than humans and will lack consciousness.
That's of course assuming that World War 3 doesn't come along first and kill off half of the life on earth. The world is an interesting place right now, but also a terrifying one. All it takes is one mistake on one side and nuclear war becomes a reality.
You're right, it might just take one creepy scientist or engineer to cook up something incredibly evil and then put the whole world at war. Imagine have that type of tech that can do mass damage.
I agree that war robots will come first, afterall, they're expendable and far less valuable than human lives.
Personally many people will prefer to have robots friends lol, I think they're probably make better helpmates and conversational partners, unfortunately I think that's too sophisticated tech to exist in 2025.
How has it been with you?
i have read without 20-30 years there will be milions of robot around... anyway yeah movies are exaggerating, we don't even know if it possible to get a self aware AI, for now AI are just good actors mimicing humans, nothing more... no feelings, no self-awareness
Yeah, I agree that it's going to be completely difficult for AI and programmed robots to suddenly grow feeling and consciousness, it's just always intriguing when a movie portrays it like this. My point with the movies is that, some of the directors or writers tends to agree that people actually abuses AI
Hmm I can't really agree, I mean if it's not a conscious entity nor self aware it's not different than abuse a car or any tool
I think AI lovers could be one of the pinnacles of trying out stuffs with AI, especially if this loneliness meta spreads further. What I personally fear the most is the lost of individual effort, people stop exerting themselves both physically and mentally, delegate everything to AI and then act like "virtual potatoes" doing God knows what with their time. Having a lot of free time on our hands can definitely be a good thing but it also comes with the potential bad or ugly of sinking into a state that's utterly meaningless.
I wouldn't like to have a lot of free time on my end. I like to be on the grind and on the go, and if I was much healthier, it'll be even better.
I believe you're right when you say people will become overly reliant. A lot of human invention is for comfort, ease and amusement, and this might even continue into the future.
Yes, I think there's a sense of accomplishment when we're on the go, creating or doing something, the process, and experiences that come with it.
Right, we want comfort as it gives us a sense of certainty, albeit a flimsy one.
I think anything can happen, and honestly those types of stories have been around for quite a while. I remember Terminator or Matrix where science can have weird effects. I think it depends on the safeguards that people program into the technology.
Yeah, these type of stories have been around for a very long time indeed, I think more stories are made everyday on robots consciousness, as if we expect robots to, one day, grow consciousness.
Humans are abusive to animals (pets) and other humans (their own). I doubt they won't be abusive to AIs or robots. Not all people are abusive, of course... The question is, will AI/robots care?
Of course they won't care, I just find it mostly funny to imagine that somehow, somewhere, in their own state of creation, maybe they'll care, or perhaps I've been watching too much SCI-FI
It's almost like Hollywood uses that same blueprint as a kind of moral warning. It says more about our fears than about the technology itself, we create something powerful, mistreat it and then face the consequences and blame the scientists while we face the consequences
I think AI is accessible to everyone today, but that easy access can have side effects like becoming overly dependent on it.
Congratulations @josediccus! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain And have been rewarded with New badge(s)
You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOP