RE: New Bylaw On Surveillance Cameras
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
I was just shaking my head while reading this.
In the last house I was in, I had something stolen from my car while it was sitting in my carport that was attached/part of my house. Honestly, I didn't expect them to catch a thief from an un-witnessed theft, I just wanted it on record in case it became part of a new spree, they would know. The first thing the woman that answered the phone asked me was if I had cameras. It was in a rental house and of course I did not and because of that she was pretty sure there would be nothing to go on. I understood and expected that, but still, I really just wanted there to be a record of it.
If you don't have a camera, you are almost on your own!
In SA everyone who is a citizen has to have an identity document like a driving license that also has a record of your finger prints. If they check the finger prints are not on the data base then you are an illegal alien and why open borders is not a great thing aa we have millions of unregistered unknown people. Cameras should not be required to convict a criminal, but more of a deterrent. Criminals have no rights in my book and if they cross into your yard then they should not expect to leave and can become part of the landscape.
That last part made me laugh, but it should be true.