RE: Splinterlands | Reason I Voted NO on The Market Fees Proposal!
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
I held my nose and vote yes on this one. I don't like the fee structure or the increase. I use monstermarket for the 3% cash back. This will hit that and then it will cost another 1-2% when selling them. THat just sucks. However, its the first proposal that gives the DAO revenue from people playing the game and trading assets vs minisets and airdrops.
I think the expectation of minisets being sold to fund the DAO is damaging in so many ways and needs to die immediately.
Just curious, it looks like you're using some redundant tags. Is there a reason you don't switch out SPT or Splintertalk for !PGM ?
!WINE
0
0
0.000
Congratulations, @imno You Successfully Shared 0.100 WINEX With @costanza.
You Earned 0.100 WINEX As Curation Reward.
You Utilized 1/4 Successful Calls.
Contact Us : WINEX Token Discord Channel
WINEX Current Market Price : 0.094
Swap Your Hive <=> Swap.Hive With Industry Lowest Fee (0.1%) : Click This Link
Read Latest Updates Or Contact Us
BUY AND STAKE THE PGM TO SEND A LOT OF TOKENS!
The tokens that the command sends are: 0.1 PGM-0.1 LVL-0.1 THGAMING-0.05 DEC-15 SBT-1 STARBITS-[0.00000001 BTC (SWAP.BTC) only if you have 2500 PGM in stake or more ]
5000 PGM IN STAKE = 2x rewards!
Discord
Support the curation account @ pgm-curator with a delegation 10 HP - 50 HP - 100 HP - 500 HP - 1000 HP
Get potential votes from @ pgm-curator by paying in PGM, here is a guide
I'm a bot, if you want a hand ask @ zottone444
If the proposal was to still have a 5% tax and just 1% of that going to the DAO I would have voted yes as I like the idea behind the dao getting some more revenue. Right now and in the future it is getting that already from the SPS that comes in for the Riftwatchers packs.
I have no clue what PGM is, just hard to keep up with everything going on with the tribe tokens and I also can't say I have much belief in most of them.
I agree. I'd rather they change the structure and not make it 6%. I know the DAO is getting SPS from Riftwatchers (and nodes and from the huge white paper allocation) but I'm just fundamentally opposed to the DAO being funded by selling inflationary assets, especially when it requires free labor to create those assets.
The team has created an expectation in the community that this is how the DAO funds itself and now no one wants to let it go even when the team is out there telling us it was a mistake that they did that (which I've been saying since they announced it).
The fact that we're this far in and this is the first time anyone has put forth a proposal to fund the DAO in a sustainable way is suprising to me but for the DAO to be self funding, we need proposals like this. My worry is that if it fails, we don't see another one like this for quite some time.
I also think the proposal leaned too hard into the idea of getting DEC to peg. Maybe that's really how the author felt or maybe it was just a way to get more people like Aggy on board. To me, that's the least interesting part of this proposal but its all I see anyone talking about.
re: PGM I just brought it up because it seems like if you're going to use tags, you should get more out of it. Nothing special about PGM (even though I do have quite a bit of it) but its another gamer token and it's one of the few projects where the founder is still active this deep into the bear market, so I respect that.
I'm pretty sure if you use Splinterlands, splintertalk, or SPT, you automatically get oneup and maybe even thgaming. A bunch of those tags have crossover.