Either with me or against me.

Well, it depends on where you are and what you're doing when I'm sleeping.

The thing is that, as far as I know, I have no enemies and I'm nobody's enemy either. As Scorpions sang...Life is too short.

The most probable way you'd have me as an enemy is you attempting to or harming my family's integrity in any posible way.

That said. I'll carry on.

I've commented it somewhere before, I like challenges. So, in order to improvement I prefer conversations on any topic with someone that's against me, well, against my opinion, that, that is a challenge, an enriching one for one's improvement. I think that to hold a good debate on any subject there has to be a very strong opposite part for me to get out of it (the debate) stronger and better armed than what I started, win or lose at the debate, the outcome is a win-win situation in my opinion.

Yes, cause if I get to win, it means I had to put some effort in it and also means that I'm fucken sharp and armed enough at the theme, at least for that battle, cause there's always someone somewhere that could be a stronger opposition in a similar confrontation.
On the other hand if I lost before the strong opposite side I'm sure I will get out of the debate strongly and improvemently prepared and armed as well in both, the knowledge of the subject we were debating and defense (eliminating the weak spots in my defense that allowed my defeat). As I said, it's a win-win scenario, a well invested time and a fucken productive outcome out of a real conversation with some worthy adversary.

That little reflection leads me to wonder myself...Why is it that that bothers some people?

I mean, many people get upset when one holds a criteria against theirs. Would they rather get an easy victory over a weak and poor criteria? Would they think themselves as a top improved persons that they hate that much one powerful, worthy to hear, backed up in knowledge criteria against?

As I see it there's no worthy victory without a worthy resistance standing in front, take it to sports area, to knowledge area, take it to any contest, take it to hunting,...take it to love.

Not that in love you'd have an adversary, well you might, but what I mean is the girl in front, would an easy-to-get girl please you or be worthy of the same value than the one you have to fight for?(in the better sense of the word, not real sword or guns ancient duels) Guess not ( still my humble opinion).

So, why is it that some people hold that criteria? Either with me or against me. WTF?

Is it a sane position anyway?

Well, me I'll keep doing my stuff, I've got a new job (I might be sharing about it some time soon, or not) in which someone might be against any of my criteria and then I won't need to crucify the person, I'll probably just get into the debate, hopefully enriching and then get out of it enriched, empowered, strenthen but won't be adding any name to a list of enemies that I definitely don't have or need, cause I have a brain that gets in the way and tells me that..., that's not worth it cause I... I am not the navel of the world, plus I'm not always right, cause I'm some other human that, as the rest, can be wrong as well.