RE: The Sane Rules For Spending Money on Women

avatar

You are viewing a single comment's thread:

You're a misogynist. See your comments below.

  • "Only give to females who don't mind giving to you too"
    (You're egotistical and materialistic)

  • "if after getting to know her it becomes clear that she's a girl who doesn't think she's supposed to give a man anything even though the man gives to her, then you should dump her"
    (You're entitled and selfish)

  • "But if you're buying things for them and doing your part to be a sweetheart, and they reciprocate, you guys are in mutual love"
    (You have a warped sense of love)

  • "A lot of women, in so many societies, have been conditioned to only be at the receiving end of gifts and expenditure"
    (A truly misogynistic comment)

  • "Apart from a good mutual relationship like this the only other option open to a spending man is somewhat like the relationship between a sex worker and a client, it's more like purchasing services"
    (Fucken hell, are you serious?)

This post of yours is a clear example that you are clueless and I'm not at all surprised. It's people like you who give men a bad name although I assume this sort of behaviour and ethos is typical over your way as it's not the first time I've read such rubbish. You should be ashamed of yourself.

hive-122315
0
0
0.000
1 comments
avatar

You made claims without making any argument to support your claims. You said, this is white, that is black, that is red, without saying why you think (an argument) that is white/black/red.

When you say something is something it should be backed with a reason why or else your claims cannot stand.

Because why should you be giving something to someone who thinks they're not supposed to give you stuff too? Isn't that the dumbest thing ever?

How could you be friends or partners with someone, you buy them things, you're kind to them but they never get you anything?

People who want to only be at the receiving end should have no space in your life.

For example these are the reasons backing what I said, what could be wrong with these? On the alternative are you saying it is better to keep giving to someone who thinks they are not supposed to give to you and who thinks they are only supposed to be on the receiving end and have a one-sided relationship with you?

Look what I said here:

Say you meet a girl and you want to go on the first date, it's not so bad if you pay for the date or get her gifts or anything during the begining stages of your relationship. But after a while it should become clear if she is someone who doesn't mind giving to you and getting you stuff too.

Clearly I'm saying there's nothing wrong with being the one who started giving and showing the love, but if after a while it turns out the recipient of the love only cares about receiving and never reciprocating the love then it is a huge problem.

What could you have against this?

Once again:

On the alternative are you saying it is better to keep giving to someone who thinks they are not supposed to give to you and who thinks they are only supposed to be on the receiving end and have a one-sided relationship with you?

0
0
0.000
Reply