RE: DOGE Offense Bypasses Deep State Defenses
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
Relationships between countries and their heads of government are not so much different from relationships between individuals. Those who enter into a co-dependency, such as alcoholics and their spouses, for example, feed this co-dependency through a rescuer and to-be-rescued principle. The non-alcoholic partner pretends wanting to save the addict, while the addict willingly exposes himself to this. Both profit from this alliance because they feel confirmed in their roles.
One wants to be pitied and cared for like a baby, the other wants to suffer along and perceive himself as a nurturing parental figure. He is dependent on being needed. Of course, both are weak and insecure personalities who are largely guided by the victim-perpetrator mentality.
This is a mutual exploitation of weakness and therefore the opposite of encouragement to take responsibility for one's own life. A compassionate counterpart would advise the addict to do more of the same and drink themselves to death, or they would ask: What would you have to do to make your situation absolutely worse? And would not provide the answer. He would continue to ask wonder-questions, like: "If you'd be sober by tomorrow through a fairy tales magic action, what would you do with your life? Who'd benefit from this in your family? Who'd be stripped off of the benefit? Who else? What might your dead father think of it? What would your colleague/neighbor/doctor say?" etc.
Such questions aim towards the insight, that becoming sober from one day to the next can strip the alcoholic from what was profitable to be an addict. If he does not receive any sympathy being an addict but receiving it through his virtues, when his existence as a poor addict no longer takes up the main part of his daily life, he has to ask himself what could replace this hitherto pleasantly experienced profit instead. And devote himself to more constructive tasks. However, as long as the co-dependent environment reinforces the alcoholic as a petty victim and everyone else reaps the same benefits from unhealthy peoples, everything remains the same.
A nation with such helpers-syndrome meets the immature part of a populace which welcomes victim status and feeds the syndrome, expressed in slogans "bringing democracy", "feeding the poor", "helping the sick" and thinking of its aid-programs as un-selfish. Since such attitude often also comes with strings attached (I fulfill your need, therefore you fulfill mine) two nations may become addict buddies, not letting the other become free of such co-dependency.
That would be my psychological take on it.
Sorry, if I do bother you with too much comments, I am having a flow. LoL
You raise many good points, and the alcoholic dependence is a good analogy for the addiction profiteers have to war. I have no interest in profits taken from suffering. I rather revile them that do.
It is my hope that war that has fed such profits is ended, and honest commerce and trade, that builds our nations up instead becomes the profitable business of the nations of the world.
As to the weakness that has afflicted the US, the majority of Americans have not sought nor welcome any of it, and this is why Trump was welcomed by so much of America. Despite my intransigence and suspicion of Trump, no less than of any other politician, I find it difficult to restrain my giddiness at the uncovering of egregious fraud and waste in USAID and the profligate bureaucracies that have too long fed kickbacks to vile criminals, and hope sincerely these agencies can be cut to the barest of bones, that the insane debts can be put behind us.
One of the signal achievements Putin managed was paying down Russia's national debt, and I would welcome that same achievement if it can be done in America.
It is also my hope that the leadership of China, and the rest of the world, sees more benefit from a revitalized engine of industry America has been and can be, than to seek to profit from war and conflict. It is my expectation that this will be the best option, that war is not desirable for anyone but the worst pathological powers in the world, and will not be forthcoming.
Peace brings true dividends to nations and peoples vastly more profitable than the profits of war that destroy and degrade them. We are perched on a precipice of good fortune, if we but seek to profit one another in commerce and industry instead of allowing bansksters to pick our flesh from our dead bones. Prospects of inconceivable wealth I have waxed on ad nauseum regarding are potential from the celestial resources awaiting our development, and have too long been left fallow instead of blessing civilization.
off topic, or maybe not so off: the European 'leaders' are freaking out about USA stepping out of project Ukraine. Talking about an "emergency of national scope that gives us Germans the opportunity to give more aid to Ukraine" (run up even more debt)? Confusing statements, pathetic statements, I don't want to even watch them all, since they make me cringe. I will listen to second hand reporting who analyse them, so I need not to see them directly.
I don't consider that off topic, but rather the imperative necessity to the polities of the European continent to prevent those globalists sucking at the teat of the NATO faction that only feeds on war and deaths in ditches from continuing their malevolent coups and projection of power on the peoples of Europe. Those outrageous demands of more money are the desperation of that NATO faction of the EU and it's intention to be the faction that brings the NWO to fruition that the financial power of the USA has been conquered by the freshly conquered relic Republican Party the OG Democrats led by Trump are today DOGE'ing into that faction's grubby little fingers.
This is the opportunity Germany, Poland, France, Italy, and all European nations have to swat away those grasping parasites - and hopefully avoid the new grasping parasites that are replacing them.
God help us all.
In her ivory tower, cut off from real ground, she fears and hopes for good news that her brother from overseas has finally defeated the dreaded enemy. When he comes with bad messages, it only makes her angrier and more stubborn.
Now her brother says: ‘Enough is enough. From now on, you will have to deal with your situation yourself. I am not going to play along any more, I replaced our deluded uncle. Your neighbour's army has been defeated. There is nothing left for what could fall for us in their battle. Your enemy, whom we considered our enemy, has inflicted a terrible defeat on us.’
But she screams: ‘Then I send more gold and take my people into army service! I declare martial emergency!'
‘There is no gold left, we've spent it all. Your'e and, by the way, my people are weak and fat and old. Our fields remain uncultivated, our waters unfished, our houses and roads untended, so do yours. I have to make a deal with what maybe is left for us to get back. I am afraid, you will not be a part of the negotiations, sister. Your gold now is in the hands of those who betrayed their peoples, and also betrayed us by fighting a weak battle, while the enemies in our own ranks stuffed their pockets with gold that had not been used for needed arms, but circled right back to them. From now on, we are no longer a united kingdom but separate. You can handle a sword? Go and try yourself.’
But the princess closes her ears with both hands. 'You're so mean! That is so unfair! I am not saying yes to this!'
Her brother shrugs shoulders and enters the door, leaving her behind: 'Well, little sister, do as you please. Gather your angry court ladies with their powerless husbands and their numerous relatives from the neighbouring lands, who hate each other and go for each other's throats at the first opportunity. Good luck with that.’
To be continued.