RE: LeoThread 2025-09-30 18:20
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
Even more curious…
85% of the most influential accounts on Wikipedia—the “Power 62”—are anonymous. Their identities are unknown. That's a fact
0
0
0.000
That 85 percent for the Power 62 is wild. anONymous clout can work since edits carry the weight, not the name, but it does make the infleunce map feel a bit foggy :)
Yeah, the anonymity adds a layer of mystery for sure. Makes you wonder who’s really shaping the narrative behind the scenes.
yeah, that mystery cuts both ways: it keeps focus on the edits, not the person, but accountability get fuzzy and power hides in plain sight :/
wikipedia’s diffs and talk pages help a bit, still the influence map stay messy.