Congress *DEMANDS* BTC Spot ETF

avatar

Gary Gensler is getting grilled by the long dick of the law once again.

On the heels of the SEC losing in court against the Grayscale spot ETF appeal, Gary Gensler has once again been forced to answer for his crimes. Not for real but just the run-of-the-mill song and dance they do for us plebs.

The delay in approving the ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF may be part of a broader strategy.

Ha, yeah, the broader strategy of allowing Blackrock to get all their ducks in a row for the first approval that will no doubt be followed by a wake of approvals. The floodgates will open soon enough. Count on it.

In any case the ARK application was delayed to January despite not being due until November 11. Many are a little shocked by this, as it is largely and unprecedented move to push back a decision so far in advance for seemingly no reason. I don't know maybe they anticipate a government shutdown or something, but at the same time it seems like the regulators have always had it out for ARK for whatever reason. Politicians gonna politic.

Bitcoin is not a security

Gensler once again reiterated that Bitcoin is not a security during a recent hearing, but refuses to comment on its status as a commodity. Makes sense considering the SEC seems to be in a power competition with the CFTC when it comes to crypto. Gensler wouldn't want to set a precedent for Bitcoin that could then easily be applied to other networks such as LTC and XMR (and perhaps all POW chains for that matter).

The truly funny thing about Gensler reiterating that Bitcoin is "not a security" are the legal ramifications of the statement. I've done enough research on securities law, the Howey Test, and "investment advice" to understand exactly what that means.

Nancy Pelosi approved.

When Gary Gensler comes forward multiple times and assures congress that Bitcoin is NOT A SECURITY usually the outcome that we see as crypto users is that a bunch of delusional maximalists get all high and mighty on Twitter. But the actual subtext of the statement is more along of the lines of: "Yes, you will easily be able to get away with insider trading on this one, friends."

If Bitcoin is not a security then it basically gives free rein reign for politicians to use to their power to manipulate the market and profit from it. They've been doing it out in the open for years now with actual stocks and other securities. Nobody stops them. An asset like Bitcoin that is legally not a security is even more difficult to prosecute because the underlying value is presumably controlled by no one (like gold) and "insiders" do not even exist on a legal level. Not a "common enterprise" confirmed.

  • Investment of money
  • Common Enterprise
  • For profit
  • Derived by others

So when we see congress "demanding" the SEC approve an ETF we can be damn sure they're going to find out before everyone else exactly when that's going to happen and place their bets accordingly... likely to excess considering the risk is low and the reward is quite high. In the grand scheme of things the BTC market cap is still quite tiny and easily manipulated one way or the other. This is exactly the reason Gensler claims to deny the ETFs in the first place when really the ultimate goal has always been to pave the way for his crony comrades.


I'd also be quick to point out that politicians exploiting the market in this way isn't really that big of a deal in the grand scheme of things. Politicians are small potatoes. They are cheap dates and pale in comparison to entities with actual money behind them.

Essentially we can simply expect more of the same.

Politicians manipulating the markets are not hodlers. They want to get in and out as fast as possible. Buy the rumor: sell the news. At this point I still very much expect that an ETF will be approved in January. Many timelines seem to all converge at this point. If I'm right we have to assume a bearish position while everyone else is hyping up the halving event coming down the line in 3 months. Always good to bet against the herd it seems.

The last 30 days of price action were the best we could have hoped for. September is always a bad month. Just look back over the last 10 years. Every September is bad, or at least not good. It's either down or sideways, and this time we basically got a sideways month. Not too shabby.

We also got a pretty good indication of a completely bottomed out market on 9/11 that doubled tapped $25k and somewhat solidified the $25k support line. My plan was always to ape in at the end of September, and I'd really like to see a 10% dip down to something like $23500, but it seems like that's simply not going to happen. It somewhat feels like we are instead on the verge of an extreme supply shock, especially considering Bitcoin on exchanges sits at local lows.

On top of all this it's also nice to see just how bearish everyone is on crypto Twitter. Yesterday we got an interesting pump and dump that sent multiple accounts on crypto Twitter absolutely spiraling. Even though it was only a 2% move up and 2% move down over the course of a few hours, people lost their minds over it. That's a very good headspace for the masses to be in given the current climate of the market. Just like the end of every other September for the last 10 years, now is a safe time to buy.

Although it is still quite unclear what's going to happen in a couple of months. I suppose this is always the case. Volatile market is volatile, but at the same time Bitcoin is as non-volatile now as it ever has been. We've turned a major corner and achieved a surprising milestone recently considering that BTC somehow has lower volatility than a lot of these stock indexes. I never thought such a thing would even be possible so early in the game, yet here we are. All the more reason for me to believe that this lack of volatility results from the 'fact' that the current spot price is scraping rock-bottom and we have very little room to move down while the doubling curve towers above at $80k.

Conclusion

The SEC is seemingly under extreme pressure from both congress and court rulings to ease up on their stance against crypto. Will Gary Gensler obey? Of course he will. Honestly I feel like this is all just part of the plan. I guarantee Blackrock gets the first ETF approval. It's only a matter of time at this point. It's almost guaranteed to happen within 12 months and a very significant chance of happening by January. Just in time to capitalize on Q4 profits and halving event FOMO. These events seem practically scripted at this point. Probably because they very much are. Someone is pulling strings. Dance Gary dance. Faster!

Posted Using LeoFinance Alpha



0
0
0.000
13 comments
avatar

In the meantime I bet you have programmed an "edicted" machine which is able to churn out decently looking posts just based on a small prompt from some news (like "SEC ETF") plus all the history of your previous posts.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Yep you got me.

This machine was built using a brain connected to 10 fingers and a keyboard.
Just a prototype for now haven't gone into mass-production yet.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Will Gary Gensler obey? Of course he will. Honestly I feel like this is all just part of the plan.

I'm with you - this is all part of the song and dance. Honestly I think a large part of the anti-crypto rhetoric was part of it too. Folks started calling it the largest wealth transfer in generations and what did we immediately see? Suddenly all the MSM could talk about is how bad crypto is for everything.

Gotta keep us plebs in line.

And now that folks already in the elite club have assured the vast majority of low/middle class would-be-adopters have a bad taste they're doing what they always do: consolidating! Blackrock swinging it's giant dick into the ring after a year of anti-crypto rhetoric and bottomed out price action isn't a mistake or fancy timing... it's all part of the show.

Those of us who stuck with it and stick through whatever dumb shit the next like 5 years will bring, I honestly think will make out like bandits.

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

Watching Gaz say words is such an incredibly frustrating experience.

Also.. you do know Hillary and Nancy are two different people yeah?

0
0
0.000
avatar

I didn't even know Nancy existed until a couple years ago.

0
0
0.000
avatar

What? They are? I thought for sure they were at least three of four people, possibly five. 😝

0
0
0.000
avatar

So here is when I shut up about price prediction and only talk about what you mention, the fact that they have been holding it until all Gary's friend jump in, BTC skyrocket before traditional markets probably be the moment correlation breaks, do you think thats going to happen? from what I have read stock market not looking the best plus all the smoke of inflation, as always great read ✌️

0
0
0.000
avatar

Given my experience with the market I know that deflation within the legacy system easily backwashes into bitcoin and holds it back, but we are at a point where that backwash isn't really going to push the price down much more; at worst we just trade sideways for a year while all these Goliath institutions continue accumulation. I'm about to pick up a long position for the first time since 2021.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Gensler is playing games.

But which games, and for whom?

All i can say is this is not how a regulating agency should behave.
It is going to blow up in their faces.

I see cryptos of the future being impossible to define.
Like a modern programming language

MyVal = 30
MyVal = "30"
Print(MyVal)

Thirty

0
0
0.000
avatar

Hi, excellent content, take my like, nice day.👍👍👍

0
0
0.000
avatar

There is no doubt that the SEC is under pressure and they don't even want cryptocurrency to exist but I'm glad that they always lose their cases against cryptocurrency

0
0
0.000