Losing Our Cult #23: Warrant from hell.

Welcome to my little corner

Due to author rewards being zeroed out on last day of payout, by buildawhale account but really thanks to Hive's wannabe antihero, and for reasons unknown and silence on the matter, please instead use the gift 🎁 on peakd or donate liquid HIVE & or Liquid HBD here to make tips/donations.

---

The most vivid and most powerful dream your mind ever concocted to exist for you is the one your living in right now.

Your dreams are only just beginning when you wake up.

---

OFFICIAL POST HERE:

Show me ze paperz!

Is synonymous with:

Get a warrant!

They both fall under the presumption of "consent to be governed" which of course is entirely impossible to be governed while under consent. This isn't a philosophical concept. But of fact based logic reason and ethics and not just my say so.

Wanting a warrant is you falling under their super deity's fake authority. You recognize that they have power over you if you accept it as a means to give permission. But upon receiving it, most people just assume they have permission. So you let them in. Really it was just a tactic to get into your property without using force. Why fight to get the tuna and if you can just convince it to take the bate jump in the boat on its own?

Why do you want a warrant to give "officials" permission to enter your premises and kidnap you or anyone for victimless crimes?

It's just ink and paper in the end.

It isn't going to stop tyrants from invading your home.

The warrant doesn't hold any real power over you any how.

The most important thing any court case needs for there to be a case, the #1 most required element of all cases is jurisdiction, also known as authority. Likewise, a warrant requires that the cult enslaving you has your permission to use their fake rules against you. The judges know this and know very well that warrants are void at the moment of creation, because they know they can't prove jurisdiction once challenged. They instead will use any psychological manipulation tactic and including threat of force to get people to comply and accept their rule-ing.

It's not a bad defense to demand a warrant. If it works it works. But it's grounds is so widely misunderstood.

So I will put it in a different light without changing any of the actions:

A few gangsters bang on your front door demanding entry to steal your shit and kidnap a few or one person in your household, because they "broke the rules" within the turf of your favorite gang. The rule? They didn't show up to the yard to get their scheduled beating from the bullies, or they didn't pay their protection fees and now they seek to punish and get their "fair share".

You open the door enthusiastically demanding to get a written document of permission signed from the Kingpin or godfather whatever, to enter your home. The gangsters go, oh man your right, and leave.

The kingpin is feeling nice today because it's the day of his daughters wedding so he fulfils your strange request and writes his letter that states his thugs will take your shit and your husband for a swim at the lake.

They come back and break down your door, kidnap your husband or wife or kid and then steal your shit too.

Do you see how ridiculous that sounds?

A few cops bang on your door demanding entry to gather any evidence to support any law they can use against you also to arrest Johnny for not paying taxes, or because he skipped court.

You demand for a warrant signed by the judge.

The cops leave beaten by your demands to get a warrant from ze boss.

They come back with one and you are satisfied with it and let them in and thus continue to proceed with the arrest and confiscation of valuable goods within your home for "evidence" that may support a law they can use against you (to finish extorting and robbing you more).

See, I didn't really change much of anything between the two. I painted the exact same picture. One used gangsters and the other with cops(which are also gangsters). In both scenarios the victim demanded a written confirmation from the overlord of the peons. But did you ever think to ask where the overlords got your permission to be ruled?

You think a warrant is enough evidence to give them consent to kidnap and steal from you?

What is a warrent then? Where does it come from? What makes it "legit"? Who told you a warrant was enough?

I've heard it often enough from many mouths that "all "they" need is a warrant to enter your private property". This is false. They don't need it. If they the criminals want to enter your home they will, by force without or with your indoctrinated belief of them having authority over you or permission slips from your rulers.

You would consider it absurd if during school years, I got written permission from the principle or from your parents to search your personal belongings and take what I want. You would even feel how unfair it is and that would be your intuition speaking. But when it comes to the bullies of the state, without changing the acf itself, its all the sudden legit. It's an illusion.

No one individual has more rights than the next and none have the right to enslave another or force others your ideas, or delegate that non existent right to another, including in voting. Voting is nothing more than a religious ritual for the believers to be disillusioned further into the idea that authority exists.

Because none have that right, because none have authority to another, and never have and never will, we will equate that to zero.

Zero I said.

So in voting, what they are doing is adding that zero over and over again and adding emotions to it like a football game. People love to be attached to their emotions as something real. It's why statists get so angry when you question their belief in government. They're trapped in the matrix. And will kill to defend it. Don't trust a statist, they will back stab you if their god told them to, even if you have been friends for decades. Adding zeros equates to zeros. Would you deny that?

When you go out to vote you are declaring how mathematically illiterate you really are and how much your not to be trusted.

Going back to the warrant, we see the mathematical impossibility of a warrant being legit. The judge never acquired your un-ndoctrinated, and completely informed consent. They only have power over other slaves of their cult, to other citizens.

You can still claim to be a sovereign and not a citizen, but I highly advise to never make such a claim in court because, he who makes the claim had full responsibility of proving that claim. Infact, anything I say here, even though most of it true, you are not to go into court and make such claims in court. Proving your innocence is not your responsibility or theirs. It is their responsibility to prove they have jurisdiction. After which it is established (which is impossible) then you have no say or argument against them.

As a citizen, your under their authority indefinitely and have absolutely no bill of rights. The bill of rights, although recognizes human rights, only applies to "We the people" and not citizens. I can't find any reason why a rational human being would want to be a citizen anyways. It's a clear sign otherwise that they have serious mental issues to want to be rules. And it's very common indeed

The judge can issue warrants. That's a fact. But the warrants are void the moment it's created because they lack the most fundamental element. Authority.

What we have folks, is a massive cult of thugs who wish to sacrifice you to their false god. Take everything you think you own under the guise of consent of the governed. And how dear reader, would you respond to criminals wanting to do just that?

A long time ago, the original cult of thuggees of India, kidnapped and suffocated their victims for hundreds of years to slbe sacrificed to their god. The British empire, this sent to investigate and once finding all the members, eradicated most of them from existence and jailed both father and son of whome remained so that the cult would not come back again. Is this what must be done to the cult of statism, The most dangerous cult in our time to ever exist?

Personally, I don't want that. Nor would I endorse it. But if it were to pass, what is to stop the new force from declaring themselves rightful rulers? Another set of rulers? Repeat the cycle over and over again? Ridiculous.

All I want dear reader is for you to open your mind to the possibility that what you have been taught about government being legitimate is false. To question everything. And I do mean everything.

---

---

Quickly exhange and swap crypto anonymously with StealthX

R