Or Is It the Lack of Will to Know?

What if it's both?

What if it isn’t one thing?

What if the variable is so large that no single explanation can contain it? And do we even need everyone to comprehend it?

Some argue we live in cycles; hard times created by incompetence, good times created by disciplined men. One condition generating the other. A seemingly endless loop.

But what if that’s too simple?

What if there are forces beyond our perception influencing the pattern? Not necessarily mystical, just dimensions of causality we don’t yet understand.

And what if there aren’t?

What if it’s just us?

Or stranger still — what if it’s none of us?

Why should we worry about ultimate causes if no one can possibly know everything? Even if all recorded human knowledge is accessible, access alone does not equal comprehension.

We may live in an age where information is abundant, in an invisible field of data constantly available, and yet most of us function like poorly tuned antennas.

So the real question may not be, Do people fail because they lack information?

But rather:

If the information is already here… why doesn’t transformation follow?

Some thinkers have approached this from radically different angles.

Jacque Fresco argued that human behavior is largely shaped by environment. In his view, people don’t fail because they lack information, they fail because they are conditioned by systems designed around scarcity, competition, and outdated structures. Fresco pushed the idea that we need to change the environment, in order for behavior to change.

From a different dimension entirely, Terence McKenna suggested that consciousness itself may be embedded in a larger informational process where reality unfolds through patterns of novelty, not merely through rational choice. If that were true, then what we call “failure” might be part of a larger unfolding pattern we barely comprehend.

And then there are those like Nassim Haramein, who propose that reality itself is structured as information. That matter, energy, and space-time arises from deeper geometric or quantum informational fields. If reality is informational at its core, then access alone may not be the problem. Alignment might be.

So here I stand looking at these three different perspectives from well respected and underrated scientists from environmental, consciousness and the structure of reality itself and yet none of them eliminate personal will.

None of them fully explain why one person transforms with exposure to knowledge while another remains unchanged.

So the question remains:

Is failure a lack of information?
A flawed environment?
A misaligned consciousness?
Or simply resistance?

And if it is resistance...
what exactly are we resisting?

Are we resisting knowledge itself? The environment that shapes us? The subtle currents of consciousness that we cannot see? Or the very structure of reality that bends beneath our perception?

Maybe there is no single answer. Maybe the question is the point. Maybe failure and insight, ignorance and will, chaos and order, are inseparable, and locked in an endless dance.

We can scan the field of all human knowledge. We can redesign systems. We can explore inner and outer dimensions. And still, we are antennas, tuning into frequencies we barely understand, sometimes receiving signals we cannot decode.

If access to everything does not guarantee understanding…
what does it mean to truly know?

Or to act?

Or even to exist at all?

if you found this thought-provoking, consider supporting me with xmr, because my rewards are removed at payout. Your direct contribution is highly appreciated.

XMR:

86fXjLUF7W9SwGSjTtsbqq4t1LKzzypEZa1t77S5c68WF3yK9SmEfzPTtRyjUhDSk9Zn7p1ahFJT4PcKW8MN4h3QRpjx2Q5