The Glasses Were Never the Point

Superman’s disguise — a simple pair of glasses and a business suit — has been mocked for as long as the character has existed. The joke writes itself: sure, glasses can change how someone looks at a glance, but after repeated exposure? After daily contact? Surely anyone with functioning eyesight would notice that Clark Kent and Superman are the same man.

The ridicule has become so ingrained that it’s often treated as a fatal flaw in the character rather than a narrative conceit. Entire jokes, sketches, and comics are built around it. I especially enjoyed this recent comic, which leans fully into that shared cultural assumption.

And yet, Christopher Reeve quietly dismantled the entire argument with a single performance. And this is just so good.

There’s one scene in Superman (1978) that says everything. Clark Kent visits Lois Lane for a promised date. While there, he decides to finally tell her the truth. What follows isn’t a costume change, special effects, or dramatic music. He simply removes his glasses and stands up straight. Only then do we notice that he had been hunched the entire time. He straightens his posture. Then straightens even more. His smile changes. His presence fills the room. Before his voice drops into that familiar, resonant Superman register, the transformation has already happened. He has become SUperman before our very eyes.

This doesn’t “solve” the logical problem, of course. Repeated exposure would still raise questions. The films themselves acknowledge this, most directly in Superman II, and even more explicitly in the Donner Cut, where Lois figures it out on her own. The story confronts the issue head-on instead of pretending it doesn’t exist.

But that was never the real point. Reeve demonstrates that the disguise was never about fooling the audience with glasses. It was about behavior, self-presentation, and the assumptions people make. People assume Superman wouldn’t be hiding as a mere mortal, so they wouldn’t even be looking for him in Clark, especially not in this meek hunched over wimp. Clark Kent isn’t Superman hiding. He’s Superman withdrawing. Smaller. Quieter. Less confident. Less there. No one sees him because no one really even looks at Clark Kent.

With a little acting, and a lot of understanding of human perception, Reeve makes the idea believable. Not airtight. Not perfect. But believable enough.

But what do you think?

Hi there! David is an American teacher and translator lost in Japan, trying to capture the beauty of this country one photo at a time and searching for the perfect haiku. He blogs here and at laspina.org. Write him on Bluesky.

【Support @dbooster with Hive SBI】



0
0
0.000
10 comments
avatar

It's a beautiful, poignant scene. I think it says a lot about how we're afraid to show our true selves or even believe we can be seen this way, but also about how Lois is blind - bespectacled - to the beauty in Kent because of her own biased assumptions. Yes, it does seem ridiculous - that cartoon IS funny, and reminds me of my 2.5 year old grandson putting on my husband's reading glasses and saying 'I'm Gwandpa' - but humans carry with them their prejudices. How can a hero be anything but dashing? Would we want to watch a hero if he isn't?

0
0
0.000
avatar

Isn't that how our culture teaches us to be though. Look at the pretty people and ignore the not so pretty people. I think Reeves just reminded us that sometimes heroes are hidden among us. Through his portrayal of Kent, he taught us not all heroes look like Superman. Throughout, you wanted Lois to fall in love with Clark and not Superman.

Of course when I was little I wasn't thinking all this. I just wanted superman to kick ass. Then again, maybe subconsciously this may have set in too.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Oh yes we're indoctrinated early! Though I'm sure we would have loved the not so typical hero too, as we weren't brainwashed yet!

0
0
0.000
avatar

Reeves was a great actor and nobody since has portrayed Superman and Clark like him in my opinion. His ability to show that difference in the scene you shared to me displays his talent and how much he took on the personas. To me Christopher Reeves will always be Superman.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I agree, Reeves really made it work and understood how to act the part of Kent. Acting unnoticeable made him unnoticed, it's amazing how posture and confidence can completely change a person isn't it? Awesome post, I loved it!

!PAKX

0
0
0.000
avatar

What a great way to illustrate that: Presentation is everything! 😊

0
0
0.000
avatar

This is an interesting topic. It makes sense if everything mentioned about Superman's identity since the character's creation in the comics is true. They have recently tried to redefine this as if it were some formula or something that was part of the character itself.

I think that what you mention about the issue of "hiding" their identity can be interpreted in different ways. You can be yourself at home, but outside you can be someone else at work, at school, or partying with your friends. There are those who hide their true identities by pretending to be kind, understanding, interested, etc. That's why, when you discover what they're really like, you're just as surprised as when Clark revealed himself to be Superman.

It's great how this character teaches us the importance of hiding your identity from people and revealing it to those who truly deserve to know it. I'm more of an anime fan because I think that in Japan you see many stories like this of people who hide who they really are in order to fit into society.

Good post.

0
0
0.000