RE: LeoThread 2025-03-03 14:34

avatar

You are viewing a single comment's thread:

This is why u anon. There are exceptions but if ur a public figure ur just begging for the wrong kind of attention.

Glad she was prepared 🔫

leofinance
0
0
0.000
22 comments
avatar

nope Anon is for cowards.

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

i get it…but I would say it’s more for the unprepared than it is for cowards.

If she was unprepared (unarmed) she would be dead and/or out of her bitcoin for being “brave”.

Gotta consider all instances

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

Depends on the context. Anon for simple opinions in a free society, sure.

Anon in any country or context where speaking your mind can get you hurt, absolutely not.

And financial privacy is always necessary!

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

I see your points.
Even if I don’t 100 percent agree.

Freedom of transaction is my big issue currently

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

Agree, it's my #1 issue as well. I've come to learn that privacy greatly impacts that as well though.

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

Now-a-days anonymity is seen, by many, as a bad thing because people have forgotten what life used to be like when we had privacy. Some people have such a comfortable life (on and offline) that they never feel the need for it.

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

Yes. The "everyone should be public" is such a Scandinavian attitude that comes from an extremely safe and high-trust society. Ask someone from Brazil or Congo how they feel about it.

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

Some people risk their life and freedom with the work they do, they are often in danger. When we engage in things that make change in this world, there will be powerful people that don't like it, that's who we must remain anonymous from.

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

This is why it is important for Americans to protect their 2nd amendment at all cost. If she had relied on the police to protect her, she would not be telling her story.

0
0
0.000
Reply