“What is good for the turkey is good for the turkey”

When I was little and I would reply to something, I was not satisfied with something my parents did and I would complain, the answer they gave me “no because I said so and that's it”, because I said so, it didn't matter, there was no reply, there was no explanation, but if you do this today, if you prohibit all of today's children from something by arguing authoritarianism, the entire educational community will fall on you, the psychologists, the pedagogues, the entire progress of course.

“You don't know how to educate your children”, “Poor children”, if this is so, why do these same people treat us like children of my generation, because it is striking that they are saying all day that children must be To explain things to them you have to give them a context, you cannot tell a child “this is not done and you have to explain why.

To children yes, but to adults no, we do not have the right to have things explained to us, why do I say this, because we are living in a society in which our lifestyle changes and they do not give us explanations and when the We ask “this is so because I said it and that's it”, the expert on duty says it, the character on duty says it, the Soros on duty or whoever is on duty.

If I have a means of expression on any social network and I question health measures, they do not give me the explanations that must be given to children, they tell me, this is not talked about because I said it and that's it, and if you were a child I replied, they came at you with the shoe and now they come at you with strikes or with social cancellation, fines, freezing of accounts and it is also a very curious thing, they are defending scientific paradigms with unscientific reasoning.

It is curious that those who defend science, their greatest argument when you put a scientific debate on the table, is the insult and I will give you an example, here there are two opposing positions in a scientific debate and I am not talking about myself as I am not a scientist, I am talking of other people who are and have been canceled, but imagine you in a debate of equals, a debate in society, I say that the climate issue is not the fault of man, it is a natural cycle and there is another that The vast majority of the news programs are going to say, they are going to tell you, that they are worried that it is hot in summer and cold in winter.

The normal thing is a discussion between two people who defend two antagonistic positions, it would be that each of them presented their reasons, but the same thing always happens, those of us who leave the official discourse and do not see things as they want to impose them on us or at least doubt , we argue; How the sea level is rising, but look, explain it to me, I have here a photo of Long Island in 1904 when immigrants arrived on the island to register and look, you see the photo today and the water in Long has not risen one centimeter. Island for example.

How is it that if you prick yourself to protect yourself from “something” and if I don't prick myself, your protection stops working? Explain to me, these are some of the reasonable doubts, we say, while the counterarguments of the people we ask information, what are their scientific arguments against the climate issue, the vaccine issue, the issue of many aspects of life.

No matter what you say, they are insults and they are the same because they do not even bother to adapt the insult to each debate, remember when they walked around on public television proposing that they put a Little Star on our Shoulder, and they continue with their work.

And how many have lost their job, their prestige or their promotion in the workplace for dissenting because here we are dealing with criminals, people who ask questions that just ask questions; And with that, more and more people are realizing it and that's why they get more and more nervous and that's why they insult us more and more.

Thank God, good always makes its way…

Stay Free