They go for your privacy.

For those people who don't care about the violation of privacy and They justify their disinterest with the typical excuse “I have nothing to hide” and the no less typical “I don't have that much money” and they end up crowning it with “I prefer the security that a surveillance camera provides, rather than being recorded passing by.” for some specific place”

And these people do not realize that this is not about losing privacy in exchange for hypothetical security, in reality there is no lower amount of feasible security than when you do not have your privacy guaranteed, a digital euro or traceable digital currency issued by the Central Bank, it is not only that, a currency with a recognizable history, but it is a euro always associated with someone, programmable and executable, something that when you don't have much, when the "administration" arbitrarily decides something about your Even if you don't have much money, you won't be able to claim it.

We are not talking about an account seizure, which they have already done, we are talking about a life seizure, in the first case you can even keep refusing to pay, leaving your potentially seizable account at zero, but in the second case, put where If you put in those euros, they will locate them for you.

The issue is delicate; it is not about some seeing it and others not, it is about winning majorities to being active against the transfer of our own freedom.

And I am certain that there are many interests behind controlling us all, managing our programmable money and identifying us at all times, unfortunately there is already a case of this that I will tell you about on another occasion.

But they do not rest and today I am going to relate everything that is or is being done so that I renounce your freedom without realizing it, like what happened with the frog and the saucepan; The first recent news that very well defines the crucial moment we live in occurred during a hearing of the financial services committee of the United States House of Representatives, several government officials shared updates on their work in something they also call “digital identification” and “digital currencies” by its own Central Bank, the Fed.

Two types of technologies that will give the government unprecedented levels of control and surveillance power. Although several Democrats praised these technologies and criticized legislators, most of them Republicans who are promoting legislation to deactivate CBDCs, digital identifications receive enthusiastic support from From some representatives such as Bill Foster who presents as a way to mitigate the risks of Artificial Intelligence with these technologies, he also praised the digital identification systems in other countries such as India, Estonia and Korea.

The Secretary of National Security himself, a certain Alejandro Mallorcas, defends that the regulation of Artificial Intelligence to censor political speech critical of them in the United States is fundamental, the Democrats want Artificial Intelligence to be used to censor content that the government considers Fake. , but Trump says that if he is re-elected he will revoke Biden's executive order on Artificial Intelligence and prohibit the use of Artificial Intelligence to censor the speech of American citizens.

This is coupled with the fact that the Federal Government is funding a United Nations program that helps identify disinformation and false claims in developing nations.

The second news refers to the recent integration of Worldcoin in platforms such as Minecraft, redid, Telegram, shopify and MercadoLibre. It is a way of using eye iris scanning technology for digital identification and that has obviously raised an alarm in the debate about privacy and the very identity we have in this digital age.

This technological advance brings with it serious implications that threaten individual and collective freedom, primarily the collection of biometric data, specifically iris scans, are a significant leap in personal identification.

The uniqueness of this data makes it a treasure for those seeking to exploit personal information. The handling of this data by private and public companies and governments would pose a worrying scenario, not only because of the risk of security breaches, but also because of the potential abuse of this data by actors who may have bad intentions or even just to have a human database.

In a scenario where digital identity is essential for online interaction and access to services, losing or being blocked from this identity would have catastrophic effects for an individual, unlike passwords or traditional identification methods that can be modified or Once the biometric identity is restored, it is unalterable and unique, which obviously poses a permanent risk for each person. This is not going to be temporary, it is forever.

Another worrying aspect is the potential for exclusion or discrimination that there could be, not only because of race, sex or similar, but even because of whether or not one agrees with the predominant ideological thought. Imagine what that means, by the way, what it shows that we are a flock in the case that when this company filled the world with stalls where in exchange for being able to scan your Iris they gave you 50, the lines in half the world were enormous, as enormous as the global nonsense in which we are now.