RE: Relearning consistency
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
This is a standard point and nothing new.
I suggest you ask yourself what exactly have you done for the community, today, yesterday, last week, last month....so on.
List.
It could be as simple as, I have given a free card delegation of a Max RW legendary to a player.
It could be also I given 500 SPS to another player to stake, or provided them with free SPS delegation.
It could be, I have helped connect this individual to the community and helped them with guidelines to get support for leo.voter.
These are random example, in no particular order.
Again...............for me, what you wrote, is extraction. Whether power down or not.
Also ask yourself, writing a 300 word post about end of season rewards or LPUD, what kind of value it adds to this blockchain. Who will read it and why and how will they benefit from it. The answer is they won't.
Also, the engagement, or lack thereof. How many comments to you get or how much you engage on your own post, who comments on your posts? Here is the answer:
As you follow me, and have already noticed that the posts about season rewards have stopped, and the LPUD post, are for awareness, as I delegate a fairly large stake to someone who does a power up, without powering down. Stake powered up keeps the tokens out of the market, be it Hive or in this case LEO.
I know what I have done since I'm here, whom I did help, being it from free card delegations to starting players in SPL, to paying full ticket to some random person to attend HiveFest at a certain point in time.
From this point of view, I'm content with what I have done. Some of them are not even known, as if it is a charity act, I like to keep it as private as possible, as from my point of view, charity shall be anonymous.
Thank you for the constructive comments and hints.
At hive no one is entitled to any rewards. Rewards are given based on net votes; up or down based on consumers. You are here from 2016 and there is not much staked powered up hive you have to show for it. This is a fact.
If your current engagement remains where it is right now, I do not feel you are entitled to any rewards. This is my personal feeling, but I am the consumer, so I get to decide, and I don't even have to explain why I decide as such.
What you have done in the past, has no bearing to me. I feel we reward past performance too much at this blockchain. Only present and future matters to me personally.
Your past performance doesn't guarantee future results :)
I think this is also a well known statement.
And I was thinking, we have a constructive discussion in here. Why does it always have to be aggressive? Why can't it stop to a constructive point, where an idea has been taken and worked on?
Maybe this is a point we all have to work on, to see how we can make this place better and thriving. Now I will go to bed, as it is closing to midnight in here. Hope that my comment is seen as food for thought. Have a good one.
"aggresive" is an opinion.
just like 'downvote' is widely considered an attack. It is NOT.
Downvote is just disagreement on rewards and it is NOT personal. I downvote people because I believe they don't deserve that reward and I redistribute it back to the reward pool. It is not personal because I am NOT taking away any money from you, as the money is not yours until day 7 at payout. Also when I downvote, I don't gain anything, other than curse words:)
Once you understand this concept, you will see that there is nothing 'agreesive' about what I do.