Abolition of Money

I was having a conversation with someOne online about solving for the moneyed psychopaths in control on Our planet, and offered the idea of obsoleting money.  Not “abolition,” but merely obsoleting it.  Like the buggy whip was obsoleted by the “horseless carriage” back in the day.  We could still use buggy whips, but why?

This One replied to Me:

I always find people proposing the abolition of money to be interesting, I personally do not view money as the problem. The problem in my opinion is taxation and adherence to false authority.

I.e allowing the banks to have a monopoly on the creation of currency was always the worst possible idea humanity ever went along with.

And so I replied...

Let Me ask…  Given that money, offering power over Others, will promote psychopaths to the top – Their lust for power over Others and Their psychopathy combine to promote Them choosing unEthical behaviors to garner the most – in an anarchy, and even with no banks, what would stop Them from getting the most and paying People to bring forth Their agendas?

And there is a difference between the removal of tokens to account for the energy We add into a system (shells, beads, metals (coins), paper (bills), electronic bits) and going to just good/services (trade/barter) and completely removing the point to accounting for Our energy added into a system.

For the foundational function of "money" (in any of those forms) is to ensure We are adding Our "fair share" of energy into the community/system.  This was used in times of scarcity, when all hands were needed to get needed things done, to ensure no One "skated" on the efforts of Others.  In the very few societies that emerged in abundance (mostly "island paradises"), though cultures varied, the one thing that was common is that They never developed the practice of accounting for everyOne's energy added.

Rather, They used social currencies to motivate Themselves.  Thanks, appreciation, lauds, adoration, praise, admiration, Self satisfaction, etc.

Today, given We can now access the abundance of Our planet, the 80% of Us presently doing nothing but moving energy accounting tokens (money) around, and overall upward to the psychopaths in control (cashiers, sales, advertising, marketing, accounting, insurance, Wall Street, banking, etc.) will starve in a trade/barter situation.  Clearly, as presently only 20% - or much less as work is automated – are needed to get needed work done.

If We all are trying to prove Our energy input with something tangible to trade for what We need, We will struggle to have what is needed to produce, and if We luck out and can produce something, the value in the frenzy to produce something will be minimal.

If, on the other hand We obsolete the point to accounting for energy completely, by adding free energy tech openly (I personally know We do have free energy tech in black projects – hidden because it obsoletes the moneyed psychopaths' single tool to power), without which They become mere petty criminals if They break the three Laws* (everything in the legal system is not a Law; they're all legalates) - We can automate all needed work no One wants to do, and free Us all to do what We love to do.

We can use social currencies as Our motivation, and things like planned obsolescence (which presently is creating 90%+ of the waste on Our planet) will vanish, as the reputation earned will be negative if We produce subpar works.  For things created the best way, We will earn stellar reputation.

The arts and the sciences will flourish.  The People will live richly.  And We all become responsible for arresting (or calling for help in arresting) Any who break the three Laws.  Try Them, and if found guilty, deliver Ethical consequences.

I look forward to Your thoughts!

* These are the only Laws:

The three Laws of Ethics (Natural Law expressed as the three things not to do):

1.  Do not willfully and without fully informed consent hurt or kill the flesh of anOther

2.  Do not willfully and without fully informed consent take or damage anything that does not belong to You alone

3.  Do not willfully defraud anOther (which can only happen without fully informed consent)

That One replied:

Interesting. I have had debates with communists before that have offered similar suggestions. I dont particularly have that much of a problem with it, I think a favour for a favour is something people have always done since the dawn of time. Unfortunately as I ponder and imagine such a reality I find the problem being that I think such a system works in a small town, which naturally encourages high trust. But I think the system fails in a city scenario. Albeit this is likely why cities have always been terrible places as nobody knows or trusts one another and there is too many people to know even if you tried.

For me personally the answer is simple. Dont live in a city lol. But our current matrix system is geared towards the cities being central points of power. The banks and the government use cities as their cash cows and hubs of control. And its easy to understand why, because they can hide behind their slaves who are fully reliant on the system being maintained by the masters they crowd around. Its a bug colony for a good example, and breeds only the lowest form of human existence.

Such people will not be easy to sway in any direction to a new system. They only care about as much convenience as possible so they can get back to their cubicle. My personal opinion is if everyone left the cities, humanity over all would be much better off, no matter what the currency was.

And thus far the conversation is left with My response (links adjusted for platform...):

Well, abundancism has elements of both communism and capitalism, but it's better than either.  I offer another link here for details.

The Third Option:  Anarcho-Abundancism  (article):  https://peakd.com/informationwar/@amaterasusolar/the-third-option-anarcho-abundancism

As for the functioning, it's not a favor for favor economy.  As We have the ability to automate any needed work no One wants to do - all the uncreative work – and the creative work, with all of Us available to do it, enough of Us will love to do the work. paid in appreciation, gratitude, lauds, bragging rights, etc.  Or just Self satisfaction.

The goods and the services will be available for All to partake of freely. and We will own what We use.  Even if that use is provoking nostalgia.  As long as We acquired it Ethically, it is Ours.

As for "swaying" anyOne to a "new system..."  Given 100% of the cost of everything is energy – the resources sit here freely but it takes energy to put them into useful configuration – adding free energy will begin removing the cost of energy.  Down the line it will go until it gets to the point that it's more energy than it's worth to collect the penny for [whatever].

No swaying needed.

Of course this is why the moneyed psychopaths hide and suppress the technologies that have come out offering free energy.  Avidly!  They know it obsoletes Their single tool to power.  Without money, They become merely petty criminals if They do anything unEthical.

They Don’t Teach Ethics Anymore  (article):  https://peakd.com/informationwar/@amaterasusolar/they-dont-teach-ethics-anymore

Love always!

Would love to hear Your thoughts on this exchange!

---

As My regular readers know, I ask for no money as payment for My work for Humanity.  I ask for payment in shares.  Please, if You feel My work has value, share with ten or more People.  This will be the only way the information is spread.

Links to My work for Humanity:

Obsoleting Money  (article):  https://peakd.com/informationwar/@amaterasusolar/obsoleting-money

A Symbiosis of Humanity and Our Planet  (article):  https://peakd.com/informationwar/@amaterasusolar/a-symbiosis-of-humanity-and-our-planet

The Waste Saved Without the Need for Money  (article):  https://peakd.com/informationwar/@amaterasusolar/the-waste-saved-without-the-need-for-money

Do You Grasp that It’s Us Against Them?  (article):  https://peakd.com/truth/@amaterasusolar/do-you-grasp-that-its-us-against-them

The Psychopaths Are Trashing Our Planet  (article):  https://peakd.com/truth/@amaterasusolar/the-psychopaths-are-trashing-our-planet

The Laws of Ethics Stand Higher Than the Legal System  (article):  https://peakd.com/truth/@amaterasusolar/the-laws-of-ethics-stand-higher-than-the-legal-system

---

Signature:

Endia – A Short Story by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/260/endia

Quite the Opposite – A Short Story for Change – by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/72/quite-opposite-short-story-change

The Abundance Paradigm – A Novella by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/242/abundance-paradigm-novella

My father taught Me never to believe anything.  He told Me to place probabilities and adjust them as new data come along, asking the question, "Does that explain what I see?," when evaluating data.  He was an aerospace engineer, and worked with T Townsend Brown (see My featured vid on Odysee or YouToilet).  From a very early age I was concerned that the way I was told things worked, in terms of government and social affairs, did not explain what I saw.  So the first few decades I worked to determine WHY this was.

I wound up in banking, seeing the flow of things in the headquarters of a major bank in Los Angeles.  I became intimately familiar with the flow of money, and economics.  I asked the question, "Why do We use money?"

When the web arrived, My research capabilities flourished, and I learned much that explained what I saw, but the only explanations I found for why We use money started with trade and barter, which are still money in a direct form, and did not answer the WHY.  Then, I came upon the explanation that these were used because, with a finite amount of stuff, it was to ensure that We got Our "fair share" in a scarcity environment, in exchange for the work We added.

From this I realized the WHY.  We were accounting for Our energy input into things.  And that We needed to do this because the Human energy was scarce compared to what We needed to be produced (back then).

I also discovered that over half Our planet's wealth was "owned" by fewer than 100 Humans...

I was very interested in psychology, too.  And studied it deeply, being fascinated by psychopathy, focusing on that aberration, learning that They had discovered a gene that manifested Individuals who were incapable of love, compassion, caring, and empathy for Others – primary psychopaths.  Seeing that the wealth was so disproportionate, and that the families who "owned" it inbred, what would explain what I saw would be that They wanted to retain that psychopathic gene.  Given that the wealth could feed, clothe, house ALL of Us (and give Us freedom) abundantly and many times over, and yet None set forth to care for Humanity, I had to give probability approaching 100% that They are psychopaths, as that explains perfectly what I see, and answers My quest for why the way I was told things worked did not explain what I saw.

And I asked...  If I was a psychopath, with enough wealth to buy anything and anyOne I wanted to, and given that money = power (power over Others is something psychopaths seek), would I be motivated to create a false "reality" for the masses and thereby manipulate Them?  I think You can figure out what answer I came up with.  And would that explain what I see?  Absolutely.

Now, given that money is merely the accounting token used to account for Our Human energy, it would follow that free energy would threaten fully the accounting for Our energy.  If I was a psychopath, with enough money to buy sites like Wikipedia, the media, the education system, etc., would I do all I could to suppress and hide free energy?

And given I personally know that electrogravitics offers both gravity control and energy from the aether (the electromagnetic field that pervades the universe), and that it went into black projects, such efforts to hide and suppress would explain what I see completely.

So I am neither a "conspiracy theorist," nor am I a "conspiritard," but rather...  I am a conspiracy analyst.  And given this analysis, knowing that conspiracies are the NORM in history and that they didn't just stop some years back, I conclude that conspiracies abound.  That explains perfectly what I see.

Love always.