RE: RS Burn Engine: Daily Report #40 We are under attack....

Although I don't fully agree on the why, i.e. pumping up gaming tokens' value or making their nft's more scarce is going to magically bring new users to the games, I can tell you why the how is wrong from my perspective.

You're footing the value exchange to all hive stakeholders for "content" that is barely content, just a paragraph daily that may be unique while most of the rewards are being generated to purposely devalue hive in exchange for a token that a few stakeholders benefit from. Why should Hive stakeholders accept that?

When you make the decision to devalue hive in the form of selling hive on the markets, you lose something when doing so, but through curation you're not losing anything as long as the posts don't get downvoted as you've stated a few times in your recent posts. You're attempting to take value from hive for a token that only a few benefit from rather than spending your own hive you've earned through effort and participating in curation to buy them yourself or rely on delegations/donations. I'm pretty sure the reason you've amassed these amount of votes on these many accounts is also because of the interest of the voters to benefit their token holdings at the cost of hive. It wouldn't make sense else why you're getting this much rewards considering you're barely engaging unless downvotes occur.

Another acceptable form could be authors donating beneficiary rewards without a quid pro quo where only if they donate will they get curated and ignoring others posting in the game's community because they didn't donate, for instance. General curation rules apply.