Putin(Russia): Behind The Veil of War Through The First Official Interview With The Russian Leader Since The War Started

avatar
(Edited)

It's my first time penning down this post, and I hope it receives more attention than my previous one. I had a frustrating experience yesterday when I accidentally deleted over half of what I'd already written. Nevertheless, let's delve into the Russian garden and hear what Vladimir Putin has to say about the war in Ukraine.

We've witnessed Zelensky traversing the globe, pleading for military aid and receiving billions from the US and EU over the past couple of years. Unfortunately, some of this aid has lined the pockets of corrupt Ukrainian military leaders, while most has fueled the industrial military complex. A fraction may indeed reach the battlefield in the form of weaponry.

War remains one of the most profitable ventures for the elites, all at the expense of taxpayers and those who lose their lives in its wake. It's worth noting that if Tucker Carlson hadn't flown to the Kremlin to interview the Russian president, we wouldn't have heard Putin's perspective on this war in the mainstream media.

Since the onset of the war, mainstream media has vilified Putin and attributed all negative economic indicators to him. However, even a schoolchild knows that one man can't be blamed for all the world's woes, and poor fiscal policies adopted globally during COVID-19 will undoubtedly have repercussions.

Tucker Carlson's recent interview with Vladimir Putin, posted on Twitter, garnered considerable attention. Carlson, no longer perceived as a mouthpiece for the elites, is making waves with his content on Twitter. The interview has already amassed 173 million views and is being translated into various languages.

The two-hour interview begins with Vladimir Putin spending the first 30 minutes lecturing Carlson on the history of Ukraine. In Putin's view, Ukraine is an artificially created state by Stalin, incorporating territories from Hungary, Poland, Russia, and Romania.

20230922_232524-01.jpeg

The conflict between Ukraine and Russia has been ongoing since 2014, with the past two years witnessing a full-blown war that has inflicted significant harm on Ukraine's population. But how did it all begin?

Did you know that Putin once asked Bill Clinton if Russia would ever be allowed into NATO? This exchange occurred in 2008 during Clinton's visit to Russia, with the resounding answer being NO. This interaction sheds light on the founding principles of NATO. Furthermore, there's the matter of the Minsk agreement.

According to Putin, there was an informal understanding between Russia and NATO in the 1980s that NATO membership would not extend beyond the eastern border of Berlin. NATO's disregard for this understanding, which was not formally documented or signed, led to its expansion closer to Russia, with Romania being one of the neighboring countries that joined NATO.

When discussions arose about Ukraine potentially joining NATO, Russia felt compelled to take action, leading to the current nightmare scenario. From the outset, it was evident to me that Russia would not tolerate NATO encroaching so close to its borders. According to Putin, NATO military bases were already established in Ukraine under the guise of "training programs for the Ukrainian army."

According to Putin, mercenaries from America, Poland, and Georgia are currently fighting in Ukraine alongside Ukrainian forces, equipped with weapons provided by various nations. Consequently, labeling this as solely Ukraine's war seems inaccurate. In essence, we're witnessing a semblance of a world war, albeit on a smaller scale than its predecessors.

Negotiations aimed at halting Russia's military actions in Ukraine, purportedly to "denazify" the country, were discussed in Istanbul a couple of years ago. However, Volodimir's refusal exacerbated the conflict, resulting in the loss of hundreds of thousands of lives and substantial damage to the country.

Furthermore, Zelensky's desperation for conflict in Ukraine, undoubtedly influenced by the ruling elites, is evident in his decree banning any negotiations with Russia. This suggests long-standing support from America to weaken Russia economically and politically, unless a shift occurs with Trump's potential reelection. The true impact of Russia's weakening measures remains inconsequential. Sanctions imposed on trading Russian commodities against the US dollar have only served to undermine the dollar's hegemony, with BRICS nations predominantly opting for transactions in Russian rubles and Chinese yuan.

The Nord Stream situation remains contentious. While Putin refrains from explicitly attributing responsibility, he implies that those with the means and motive are responsible. Germany's decision to import LNG from America in response to the incident appears to be significantly affecting its industries.

The disparity in public exposure between Putin and Zelensky is emblematic of the control exerted by elite-owned media outlets. Only narratives aligning with their interests are propagated. Twitter's recent discourse on freedom of speech, catalyzed by Elon Musk's involvement, underscores the significance of platforms like Twitter and individuals like Tucker Carlson in providing a platform for diverse perspectives. Without their efforts, Putin's insights on the war would likely remain unheard.

The Russia-China relationship serves as a pertinent example of amicable neighboring relations driven by necessity rather than choice. Ukraine failed to grasp this dynamic. The conflict became feasible following the 2014 coup d'état, which saw the installation of a US-backed president who initiated provocations against Russia.

This post unequivocally condemns violence and conflicts. However, it emphasizes the importance of considering both sides' perspectives in conflict analysis. Tucker Carlson facilitated this discourse, shedding light on the ramifications of NATO expansion into Ukraine, which arguably precipitated the conflict and its global repercussions.

Here you have the whole interview if interested in watching and would like to read your opinions on this matter.

Thanks for your attention
Adrian



0
0
0.000
17 comments
avatar

Tucker... Shit himself on this interview. And realized too late he interviewed a madman and an idiot.

Putin believes he is some kind of god. And will bring together the Soviet Union again. It's now ended up destroying the country.

Let's go back and actually have some real history. In fact the worst part about this is the fact that Russia didn't pay its loans from the world war II Lend-Lease program. And that's the real reason why Russia went bankrupt. In fact Russia just decided not to pay the bank and to default on all of its loans so now the war with Ukraine means that Russia has to Bear the entire financial burden!

The documents came out showing that Russia has to pay for Iranian drones at 10 x the regular cost? Oh and that actually has to be paid in gold... Yep that's right a drone that should only cost $25,000 costs Russia a quarter million dollars.

Then on top of it we're all so seeing America charge Ukraine seven times the cost for military equipment and ammunition... Plus transportation...

The Democrats are fleecing Ukraine while the rest of NATO struggles to support Ukraine. Infact this really underlines the fact that Donald Trump had thrown this huge fat fit about NATO refusing to invest the same amount of military support that the United States put into our side...

So now as American sport support starts to dwindle we are going to see Europe having to play catch up and increase their levels of support.

Although later this week we are going to see Russia hit 400,000 killed in action. Is looking like Russia just might not ever be anything more than a third world country after squandering all of its resources on a losing war.

Ukraine now looks like Texas. And now has the same amount of national pride.

0
0
0.000
avatar

All of this could have been avoided if NATO would have not dragged Ukraine into “applying for membership”. That simple…

0
0
0.000
avatar

Or held to the Minsk agreement. That makes us look like weak victims to Putin.

And it's karma that Russia is breaking itself on New Texas. It's like watching glassass. Russia wedges itself on top of a glass jar. Only for it to break inside of the butthole of the Red army. We are watching Russia trying to pick out the shards with it's bare hands.

Hahahaha hahahahahahahaha!

Shame as now Ukraine, Finland and Sweden is now NATO. Putin pushed everyone right into NATO.

Then the instability of the entire eastern Russia front. China keeps pushing to annex the eastern oil fields. That might start china vs Russia here soon. If China don't economically shit the bed.

0
0
0.000
avatar

The Minsk agreement, yeah… NATO literally took a piss on that…

I doubt though we will see any conflict between China and Russia anytime soon.

0
0
0.000
avatar

China is about to go bankrupt. Russia is too.

And let's see. The way Putin is being so intelligent that might happen. Especially if China sees Russia is unable to defend that eastern oilfield. However I'm guessing that Siberia and the oilfield might become a 51st state of the USA over the Ukraine debt. I bet Ukraine wouldn't mind that.

I wouldn't either...

0
0
0.000
avatar

An interesting comparison is to consider the Cuban Missile Crisis, when the US was prepared to start a nuclear war because the USSR put nuclear missiles within 1200 miles of Washington, and the current one, where Ukraine in NATO would put US nuclear missiles within 300 miles of Moscow. How did they expect Russia to react ?

What I found interesting in the interview was the vast cultural gulf. I suspect a lot of the interview will go over the heads of a Western audience used to a snappy back and forth with concepts dumbed down to their absolute simplest form. If I've understood the Russian mindset correctly, then understanding the historical context means you should be able to work out (and actually understand) the answer to the question yourself. I guess they still teach critical thinking over there.....

0
0
0.000
avatar

True. The whole thing started because of the supposed NATO expansion in Ukraine. That’s what many refuse to see.

0
0
0.000
avatar

No, that's not why the whole thing started. That is just what Putin told you. And apparently you just assume he is telling the truth, because after all, why would he possibly lie? Has the ring of a similar answer from Trump on the same topic, doesn't it?

Does it really make sense to you, this argument that it was a concern about nuclear missiles that caused Putin to invade Ukraine? Give what I assume is a normal understanding of military armament possessed by the US and by Russia, does this really make sense to you?

0
0
0.000
avatar

What’s your take then on all the matters you are asking me as if I ever mentioned in this post that I agree entirely with Putin?

I am quite hard to fool, you should know… I called the pandemic a scam since day one, never wore a mask or took any vaccine.

There would have been no war if there would have been no talks regarding a potential integration of Ukraine in NATO. Will make a more detailed post on this matter a bit later.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Of course and it is very different because we are in a different era. During the cold war a war between US and USSR could erupt every day so it is different trying to send Nuclear Missiles in a place that can launch the into Mainland USSR than a whole country wanting to turn to NATO and the "west" . If you were Ukrainian would you want to live like a European or like a Russian?

0
0
0.000
avatar

to me it doesn't matter is Ukraine is an artificially created state or not, but let the leader' stop trading on the blood of people. There were countless number of people who lost thier lives and the media help the statistics.

Necessary negotiions should be carried out.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Leaders don’t care about human lives. All they care about is their egos, business and control…

0
0
0.000
avatar

Tucker is a man that will do everything if he gets paid just listen to the tapes they have on them about how he loathed trump but at the same time he praised him on the air. Why should Zelenskyy accepts a complete surrender? The whole ordeal started in 2014 when the then Ukrainian president didn't want to sign an agreement with the European Union that 355 out of the 450 members of parliament voting in favor of ratification so It was not about NATO .. Then the people who didn't want to be a Russian vassal revolted the president fled to Russian and Putin annexed Crimea .

0
0
0.000
avatar

I have not finished watching the interview yet so reserve judgement. I very happy it is available to tell the Russian side of this war but Carlson comes with so much baggage I would have preferred a different interviewer. What has impressed me so far is how eloquent Putin is.

0
0
0.000
avatar

The First Official Interview With The Russian Leader Since The War Started

Actually, this is the first official interview with someone from the Collective West pack of colonial goon states… We, in the Free World had many chances to hear Vladimir Putin.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I didn’t hear anything from him im my country.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Thank you for touching on such a difficult topic. I have a hard time taking sides with one or the other. Killing people is not a civilized thing for me, killing children is something absurd. However, for now it seems to me that Russia is doing well against the rest of the world.

0
0
0.000